Who believes that Flight 92 was really shot down

Who believes that Flight 92 was really shot down?
i live in Cleveland OH and saw jets headed due east on Sep 11. They never talk about those fighters when they review that day (there were three of them) I think Bush thot it would be too disgraceful to say we shot down our own plane, so they made up this story about how the people fought back. More inspiring I reckon...and it actually may be true, but the plane was shot down...it wasn't crashed manually
Law & Ethics - 13 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
FBI and CIA
2 :
it was actually 93, and no i dont believe that
3 :
Uhh no, just get over it. Terrorist did it there is no other information or proof.There was no conspiracy. Anyway there were phone calls and they wanted to save their lives (like most people would) so they attacked in an unpopulated area so if it did go down not many people would die.
4 :
Although it is possible that it was shot down, and I believe it would have been justified, family members had received phone calls, and those calls point towards fighting back. If you knew someone was going to crash the plane into populated area, would a razor knife stop you from fighting it?
5 :
I've often wondered about that myself. But the speculation doesn't benefit anyone.
6 :
It was United Flight 93 - not 92........and if it had been shot down by a fighter jet it wouldn't have crashed the way it did. It would have exploded more like Pan Am Flight 103....you need to watch more about it on the discovery channel where they show interviews with the investigators. I am so sick of conspiracy theorists....get a life for gods sake. I wouldn't have had a problem with it if we had shot down a plane or two....but I don't think we did. You can thank Clinton for not having the military bases open where they needed to be so that there weren't enough jets to scramble.......
7 :
Well faking the phone calls and the black box is easy to do... You can tell by these things that they attempted to do something. It was not shot down but I would not have been suprised if it had. Several targets had been hit, who's to say the white house would be next? If the plane is high-jacked then something has to be done. These brave people fought back and gave their lives to protect others.
8 :
This I find terribly interesting - on the actual day of 9/11 I spoke to an eye witness living near where 93 crashed and before there was even the slightest suggestion that it could have been shot down, he told me that he saw jet fighters pursuing the plane - he spoke of two fighters. He had no doubt that it had been shot down. This was way before anybody even contemplated any kind of conspiracy or cover up. It was his spontaneous conclusion based upon what he himself had seen. I sort of blew it off at the time as perhaps wishful thinking or an attempt by the guy to put himself in the limelight. And I will add one more piece of information - the earliest reports on the crash of 93 talked about finding debris from the flight - definitive debris - I think it was 7 miles back along the flight path - yet I could never find another word on this and I ACTIVELY researched this at the time on 9/11 and shortly afterwards. These reports simply vanished, very quickly I could not even find the ORIGINAL reports of debris found a way from the crash site. I sort of assumed it was a mistake and not aircraft debris - but this is exactly what your would expect if the plane were hit by a missile. See below for information on the secondary debris fields which pretty much conclusively show that the plane was breaking up long before it hit the ground - this however does not neccessarily imply it was shot down
9 :
Well, that isn't too wise of a question to ask. The military commissions act of 2006, enacting Chapter 47A of title 10 of the United States Code enables the U.S. military to seize anyone they deem a "threat to national security" so be careful otherwise you may disappear! lol.. anyway.. Do you mean flight 93? if so.. I don't think that the plane was crashed, no do I believe that it was shot down, but in fact, two jet fighters directed the plane to Cleveland Hopkins Airport. you might be interested in a film called loose change, it's pretty interesting, but only begins to delve into the big conspiracy theory- http://www.loosechange911.com/ Also, for those thinking "you are such a conspiracy nut" - if you would stop being so hind-sighted, you'd know that the WTCs blew up at several different points a few seconds before the planes actually hit. Also, the owner of the wtc had taken out a hefty insurance policy on both towers months before the terrorists attacks
10 :
Right, so Todd Beamers wife, and the other people who spoke to their loved ones by phone just before flight 93 went down are all lying?? For all of the theories that are out there, it still doesn't change the fact that these people were talking on the phone right before it crashed.
11 :
For one thing, its Flight 93 so off the bat, you got one thing wrong. its safe to assume that you get everything wrong. Debunk Sites: http://911conspiracysmasher.blogspot.com/ http://www.911myths.com/ http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/research/4199607.html http://www.slate.com/id/1008297/ http://www.debunking911.com/ http://southerncrossreview.org/41/9-11.htm http://www.lists.opn.org/pipermail/org.opn.lists.skeptix/Week-of-Mon-20060911/003261.html http://www.politicalhobbyist.com/debunked/alexjones.html http://www.lolinfowars.co.nr/ http://www.jnani.org/mrking/writings/911/king911.htm http://gradeonegadfly.blogspot.com/2006/10/loose-change-on-upper-east-side-part-i.html http://www.911cultwatch.org.uk/911cult.htm http://www.infoshop.org/texts/debunking911.html http://www.jod911.com/ http://internetdetectives.biz/case/loose-change http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm http://www.uwgb.edu/dutchs/PSEUDOSC/911NutPhysics.HTM http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/ http://thedoc911.blogspot.com/ http://www.iht.com/bin/print_ipub.php?file=/articles/2006/09/01/news/conspiracy.php http://antitruther.blogspot.com/ http://911debunker.livejournal.com/ http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=06/09/11/1345203 Investigations: http://www.gpoaccess.gov/911/ http://www.house.gov/science/hot/wtc/wtcreport.htm World Trade Center: http://www.nistreview.org/_media/documents/NIST/appendixl.pdf http://www.hera.org.nz/PDF%20Files/World%20Trade%20Centre.pdf http://www.nae.usace.army.mil/news/wtc.pdf http://www.construction.com/NewsCenter/Headlines/ENR/20011001b.asp http://dsc.discovery.com/convergence/twintowers/twintowers.html?clik=netmain_feat1 http://blogs.nationalgeographic.com/channel/blog/2005/09/explorer_collapse.html http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/wtc/ http://web.archive.org/web/20010914230312/http:/people.aol.com/people/special/0,11859,174592-5,00.html http://news.uns.purdue.edu/UNS/html4ever/2006/060911.Sozen.WTC.html http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/nyregion/20020707_wtc_FIRE/index_FIRE.html http://www.usatoday.com/graphics/news/gra/wtccollapse/flash.htm http://www.tms.org/pubs/journals/JOM/0112/Eagar/Eagar-0112.html http://www-math.mit.edu/~bazant/WTC/WTC-asce.pdf http://vincentdunn.com/wtc.html Pentagon: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3069699/ http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2001/11/28/60II/main319383.shtml http://fire.nist.gov/bfrlpubs/build03/PDF/b03017.pdf http://criticalthrash.com/terror.html http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2002/08/23/1030052968648.html http://www.guardian.co.uk/wtccrash/story/0%2C1300%2C550486%2C00.html http://www.snopes.com/rumors/pentagon.htm http://www.geoffmetcalf.com/pentagon/pentagon-email_20020316.html http://renovation.pentagon.mil/history-renovation.htm http://www.thehawkeye.com/features/2001/911/IdxThur.html Flight 93: http://www.post-gazette.com/headlines/20010912crashnat2p2.asp http://dsc.discovery.com/convergence/flight/flight.html http://www.aviationnow.com/avnow/news/channel_awst_story.jsp?view=story&id=news/aw090971.xml http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&node=&contentId=A56110-2002May8&notFound=true http://blogs.scripps.com/wcpo/staff/2006/02/wcpocoms_flight_93_story.html http://www.s-t.com/daily/09-02/09-10-02/a02wn022.htm http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/s_90223.html http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3067652/ Moussaoui Trial: http://www.rcfp.org/moussaoui/index.php?sortby=datedesc Anniversary/Memmorials: http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/memorial/lists/by-location/page88.html http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14571441/ http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14584690/ http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12185779/ http://cagle.msnbc.com/news/9-11anniversary2003/ Books: http://search.barnesandnoble.com/booksearch/isbninquiry.asp?ean=9780805076820&displayonly=EXC&z=y http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/158816635X/sr=8-1/qid=1155609077/ref=sr_1_1/104-6098036-7150331?ie=UTF8 http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/09/19/032851.php Editorials: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A12652-2004Sep10_3.html http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2006/09/14/911-the-wingnuts-v-the-sheeple/ http://www.news.com.au/sundaymail/story/0,,20341165-5003406,00.html http://911myths.com/Another_Expert.pdf http://depts.washington.edu/uweek/archives/2001.10.OCT_04/_article9.html http://www.villagevoice.com/blogs/powerplays/archives/002835.php http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,174655-1,00.html http://256.com/gray/thoughts/2001/20010912/1989_9_11_travel.html http://www.tullyconstruction.com/projects/information.asp?id=16
12 :
Arus.Geo, Excellent work. I'm only responding to this thread so that when I debate wacked out conspiracy theorists like the one who asked this question and the ones patting him on the back for being retarded, I'll have the sources to counter them right at my fingertips. Good work!! If you don't get the ten points, you've been robbed. Call the police. Most people just pick whomever rabidly agrees with them, instead of picking the best, most researched answer.
13 :
93 was shot down by a fighter group known as the Houligans. It's on the web.